|
Protection and License called to order by Chairman Infurna at 7:33
p.m. Alderman
McAteer-Margolis motions to open Public Participation, 2nd by
Alderman Brodeur. All in
favor. No one comes forward.
Alderman McAteer-Margolis motions to close Public Participation,
2nd by Alderman Brodeur.
All in favor.
Order No. 08-182, Amending Melrose Revised Ordinances, Chapter 89
– Alarm Devices, Sections 89-7. False Alarm Charges, 89-8. Notice of
Charge; reconsideration and 89-9. Appeals as set forth herein.
Alderman McAteer-Margolis moves to recommend, 2nd by
Alderman Boisselle.
Police Chief Lyle says this ordinance has been on the books since
1992. This amendment will
bring it up to date. The
City averages 800 false alarms each year.
In 2008 to date there have been 160.
He'd like to increase the charges and change some language in the
ordinance.
On discussion Alderman Boisselle asks why section 89-9B was deleted.
Mr. Van Campen says it simply deletes the fee to appeal.
Chief Lyle says he doesn't think it's fair to charge an appeal
fee since he's the hearing officer.
Alderman Seaboyer asks if there are a number of repeat false alarms.
Chief Lyle says there are a couple of businesses that have 12 or
more every year. He is
trying to work with them but they are ignoring the invoices; he thinks
other action may need to be taken. Alderman
Seaboyer asks if the store owner is notified when the alarm comes in.
Chief Lyle says that everyone has a private alarm company which
notifies the City when there is an alarm; he imagines the company also
notifies the owner. Alderman
Seaboyer asks if this applies to residences and commercial property.
Chief Lyle says yes, and the school department as well.
Alderman Mortimer asks who the administrator is in Section 89-9.
Chief Lyle says it is his secretary.
Alderman Mortimer asks Chief Lyle to define false alarm; the
Chief says it is activation with no forced entry or when the property is
found to be secure.
Alderman Medeiros asks if this has been enforced since 1992.
Chief Lyle says it was at first but enforcement dropped over the
years. Alderman Medeiros
asks if there is a fair indication that a $25.00 charge is not effective
even though it hasn't been enforced.
Chief Lyle says yes.
President Conn says the intent of the ordinance change is not to
make money but to stop depleting valuable police resources.
Chief Lyle says that is correct.
Alderman McAteer-Margolis asks if this affects car alarms; Chief
Lyle says no, nor 9-1-1 calls.
Chairman Infurna asks if this ordinance applies to both the Police
and Fire departments. Chief
Lyle says yes. Chairman
Infurna asks if Fire Chief John O'Brien has approved this; Chief Lyle
says yes.
On the motion to recommend, All in favor.
Order No. 08-184, TRANSFER Amount: $21,800.00 From: A/C
#012111-511000 - Police – Salaries To: various Police Accounts as set
forth herein.
Alderman Boisselle moves to recommend, 2nd by Alderman
Brodeur.
Alderman Brodeur says that between orders in the Appropriations
Committee and the Protection and License Committee, roughly $80,000 in
police salaries is being moved to other accounts. He
asks why that amount is available to transfer.
City Auditor/CFO Patrick Dello Russo says there are a number of
circumstances relative to military leave and administrative absence that
allow these funds to be available. The
circumstances don't always work to the City's advantage but it does in
this case. These funds will
not allow the City to hire someone next year.
Chief Lyle says there are funds from 2 officers that were
deployed to Iraq whose pay is being 100% covered.
Funds are also available from an officer leaving in December to
go to another community and despite efforts a replacement has not been
hired. Another officer is
out on extended leave.
Alderman Boisselle asks what the $4500 in building repair is for.
Chief Lyle says the garage door rotted out.
It's a heated garage and with the cost of fuel it makes sense to
replace it.
Alderman Seaboyer asks if there are enough funds in the salaries
account for the rest of the year. Chief
Lyle says yes.
Alderman McAteer-Margolis moves the question.
All in favor.
Order No. 08-191, Amending Melrose Revised Ordinances Chapter 15 –
Article XIII, Constables, Section 15-61, Paragraph B as set forth
herein. (AL-4)
Chairman Infurna says this order was filed by Alderman Seaboyer and
asks the will of the committee.
Alderman Boisselle moves to recommend for discussion purposes, 2nd
by Alderman McAteer-Margolis.
Alderman Seaboyer says one requirement for reappointment is to fill
out an application but a requirement as a constable is to fill out
financials. Each constable
is supposed to give 25% of fees to the City.
This asks the constable to fill out a 3-year financial form which
he has to do anyway under the existing ordinance, and attach it to the
application.
Alderman Brodeur says he appreciates the intent but he doesn't think
it's necessary. There are
two reporting requirements already in the ordinance and that information
will already be accessible.
Alderman Seaboyer says that with the last group of reappointments he
asked the City Treasurer how many constables had filed their reports.
Only half of them had. With
this amendment the information would be provided in the application.
President Conn says this amendment is sending them down a road they
don't need to go down regarding reporting requirements.
A letter from the Auditor stating that the constable is in
compliance is less intrusive than having people submit financials to the
Board of Aldermen.
Alderman McAteer-Margolis says that Section F states that constables
must maintain financial records and make them available.
The aldermen already have the ability to ask for them.
Alderman Seaboyer says this amendment is just a way of asking for
that.
Alderman Brodeur asks why a copy of the Act modifying the schedule
for deposits of revenue for the service of civil process by constables
is in the packet. He asks if
it is meant to be incorporated into the ordinance.
Chairman Infurna says it is only for informational purposes.
Alderman Boisselle says that Section E (4) of the current ordinance
requires annual filing with the City per MGL c.41, § 95B.
On the motion to recommend, motion fails.
Alderman Brodeur motions the matter be given Leave to Withdraw, 2nd
by Alderman McAteer-Margolis. All
in favor.
Order No. 08-192, Communication from A & A Taxi for a taxi fare
increase by amending Melrose Revised Ordinances Chapter 222- Vehicles
for Hire, Section 222-6. Fare rate schedule.
Alderman Brodeur moves to recommend for discussion purposes, 2nd
by Alderman Boisselle.
Alderman Brodeur says it appears that the request to increase fares
is essentially due to the increase insurance premium and asks Mr.
Anthony Dietz if he can't get a better price from another insurance
company. Mr. Dietz says taxi
companies have only a choice of two insurance companies, and both offer
the same rates. Alderman
Brodeur asks how he decided on the increases outlined in the memo.
Mr. Dietz says they are the current Saugus rates but are lower
than Malden rates. Alderman
Brodeur says that no one wants to see rates go up but the cost of
gasoline is up.
Alderman McAteer-Margolis says the letter from the insurance agency
indicates an "experience modification" increase of $44,000.00
and asks what that refers to. Mr.
Dietz says he has had the same insurance company for 10 years and
accidents happen. His
business has exceeded the insurance company's limit.
He screens all drivers but accidents happen, especially when the
taxis are on the road 24 ours per day.
Alderman McAteer-Margolis says the $44,000 increase is the result
of an increase in his driver's accidents.
Mr. Dietz says yes; there was more snow this year which played a
factor.
Alderman Tramontozzi asks how many taxis he owns.
Mr. Dietz says he operates 5 in Melrose and 9 in Saugus. Alderman
Tramontozzi asks if the proposed rate increases will make them
comparable to Saugus rates; Mr. Dietz says yes.
Alderman Tramontozzi says he appreciates him coming before the
board with this proposal and there is a reasonable argument with
increased gas prices and other costs, but he doesn't think the rate
increase should be based on the experience rating of taxi drivers.
Citizens shouldn't agree to pay these increases because the
drivers are inexperienced and prone to accidents although he appreciates
that they are screened.
Alderman Mortimer asks if hackney drivers need a commercial driver's
license; Mr. Dietz says no. Alderman
Mortimer asks if there are any minimum requirements.
Mr. Dietz says he wants a minimum of 6 years driving experience.
Alderman Wright asks if he charges a flat rate to the airport.
Mr. Dietz says yes, that it is either $32 or $33 to the airport,
and all other rates are metered. Alderman
Wright asks the basis of that amount.
Mr. Dietz says the mileage and luggage.
Alderman Brodeur says he was in a cab the other day and it was tough
on smoke. The driver wasn't
smoking but had just put out a cigarette and perhaps that could be
looked at. He says the
aldermen will have to craft an order as a formal ordinance change to
increase the rates.
Alderman Brodeur motions to place the order on file, 2nd
by Alderman Boisselle. All
in favor.
Alderman Brodeur motions to adjourn, 2nd by Alderman
McAteer-Margolis. All in
favor.
Protection and License adjourns at 8:11 p.m.
|