Home

Contact the Mayor

Residents

Department Directory

Online Services

DPW Projects & Notices

Employment

Maps and Directions

Links of Interest

About Melrose

Conservation Commission
Meeting Minutes
 

Minutes of October 7, 1999

[Approved 10/21/99]

Present: Bob Boisselle, Bill Dailey, Paul Locke, Nancy Naslas, Bruce Rider

Minutes Approved

It was voted to accept the amended minutes of 9/2/99.

3 Maple Terrace

Correspondence was received from DEP, assigning #217113 for 3 Maple Terrace, Anthony & Adella Dantona.

10 Windsor Street

DEP also assigned #217112 for 10 Windsor Street, Frank Procopio. A hearing was held and approval to issue an Order of Conditions was granted at the meeting pending the issue of the Dept. #. At this meeting the Order of Conditions was reviewed and the following was added under IV. Erosion Control: "In addition to the erosion control and sediment control measures specified in the final plan, the Melrose Conservation Commission also requires that hay bales be placed along the north property line of Lot F".

Crystal Street Parkland/Ell Pond Restoration

Mr. David Dickinson, Chairman of the Ell Pond Restoration Committee presented specifications for Crystal Street Parkland Restoration, which included a current and future drawing of the Crystal Street area. There are grant funds available until the end of December to get the work done. Bob suggested that Mr. Dickinson take the abbreviated Notice of Intent and have it filled out and return it to us right away. The commission needs the paperwork to back this up. Mr. Dickinson explained that there is a 5th tennis court that has been abandoned for years and it is sinking into the wetlands, and there is an inappropriately located parking lot. They plan to remove these and turn them into shore line green space with a path.

Nancy: Which city department has jurisdiction over that land?

Mr. Dickinson: There is a memorandum of understanding between the Park Department and School Department. I believe it is the Park Department, but I suspect that legally it is the School Department. The Park Department does all the maintenance on it.

Nancy: Whoever has jurisdiction over it may need to be the applicant for the abbreviated Notice of Intent.

Mr. Dickinson: At this point the work doesn't include the 34 Crystal St. property. All signs are that eventually the property will be turned over to the city, but that has not yet happened and we are not moving forward with any restoration plans there.

Bob: Your final product here on the last sheet shows 34 Crystal St. incorporated into this.

The Notice of Intent has to show the particular project on Crystal St. at this time. Are you doing any filling in this operation?

Mr. Dickinson: There is excavation of the tennis court, excavation of the parking areas and there is backfill to grade with the top of appropriate slanting. It is just bringing it up to existing grade now and the final elevations should be the same as now.

Bob: In your submittal there should be some grading marks on the map. You should get a surveyor taking shots before and after. We will have to know the level of the ground at this point. Following procedures of this Notice of Intent you are going to have to come in with specific types of documentation that is required by the Department and by us. At this point this will not pass for Notice of Intent because you are missing information on the document.

Mr. Dickinson: Since we are working with very limited funds the way we have structured it is we have given you the existing topo of Sheet 1 and we have made it clear that the final elevations are equal to current elevations. A surveyor could drain our budget.

Bob: The initial plan and the final plan have to be certified by a registered engineer so that someone is going to be responsible. You are in a floodplain also.

Mr. Dickinson: Is there a subject of issue or is this procedure? All that we are doing takes us so much further towards flood control. We don't have that kind of funding and I would hate to have a positive project be derailed.

Bob: We have a request for a swimming pool coming before us tonight and they are required to bring in a stamp from the certified engineer with the appropriate lines on the plans showing the elevation of the property.

Mr. Dickinson: We have that.

Bob: I don't see the signature of the engineer. When you come back with the abbreviated Notice of Intent, you are going to need it stamped.

Dana Jewell: What kind of detail do you need as far as those grades go? Is this contour sheet that is done by the city acceptable?

Bob: Yes, if you have a certified engineer that will put a stamp on it.

Dana Jewell: Could the city engineer do it?

Bob: You'll have to ask the city engineer about that? If that is part of the agreement with the city and their particular part of the donation, that could be your aspect at that point. In your involvement with the grant, there was a specific city involvement in services.

Nancy: I believe there is some documentation that comes along with the form that tells you just what you need to present to us. In addition to the surveying point you need to point out the edge of the wetland and also document how far out the buffer zone to the wetland extends 100 feet so we know where we are approving that is within our jurisdiction.

Mr. Dickinson: It would be an unfortunate use of scarce public monies to have to hire an engineer when everyone knows it is clearly within the buffer zone and that is why we are doing this work.

Nancy: It is the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and applies to everyone across the board. We are required to only approve plans that show the items listed that are required and that will be in the packet that Bob will give you.

Paul: Unfortunately, prior to these rules, the history is that our exempting our cities and towns from these rules would lead to our local officials ignoring them because they feel their judgment is correct.

Bob: Is this the only portion you are working on or are your doing more?

Mr. Dickinson: Yes this is all we are working on. I hope you can work with us to get this through by December 31, 199. We do have an adoptive site designation for the trail from the footbridge to the first big light on the soccer field to try to maintain that land for conservation land. There is a lot of debris that goes back there, but it is just trail maintenance.

Bob: What is the view of the commission if I receive a Notice of Intent beforehand and advertise it in the paper for the 21st of this month?

Nancy: I make a motion that we schedule a public hearing for October 21 on the condition that all the abutters get their proper notification and notice will be confirmed, and if Ell Pond Restoration Committee is in agreement that the forms are received by us prior to that meeting on the 21st. The motion was moved.

Bob: If I get the needed information within this week I can advertise on Monday to the appropriate newspaper for the public hearing on the 21st. I need a certain time period of at least 10 days notice. Once I receive it I must meet the Melrose Free Press deadline by Monday to advertise it.

Denise Gaffey : Do you need to have all the attachments with that application if we get held up with the registered engineer?

Nancy: People often submit an addendum with their packages throughout the course of the hearing. I think that so long as you get the ball rolling for the packages completed for the public hearing then the issue won't be closed.

Bob: At the public hearing you are also submitting a registered letter to the abutters regarding the particular project. The abutters will be determined by the Assessor's office and they will have the topo map of individuals around the property. Just to make it very clear what an abutter means under the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Act: "Meeting of all abutters within 100 feet from the property line not from the limit of the proposed activity".

Bill Dailey: Regarding your contract or grant in terms of getting it done by the end of the year, does it say it has to be spent or the work completed by the end of the year?

Mr. Dickinson: I think it says the work has to be completed by the end of the year.

Bill: If it says spent you might want to see what spending constitutes. If it is contingent on spending and spending is loosely defined maybe you can put the money in escrow under the grant or your contract contingent if the work spilled over?

Bob: You could have the representative of the applicant be involved in this Notice of Intent also.

Dana Jewell: How does this become School Department's property?

Bob: It is part of the grant I believe. About 15 -25 years ago there was a large block of land transferred over to the School Department for building the middle school and high school and part of that grant was that so much federal money and acreage was needed. The past couple of years the Park Department has taken over the maintenance of this property, but the School Department still has legal authority.

Bob: Did you send a letter to the School Department or receive any correspondence from them indicating they would accept this project as described?

Mr. Dickinson: No

Bob: You may want to clarify that because they could stop the project very quickly or else it could get very muddled.

Mr. Dickinson: The next process is to send it to whom?

Bob: Give me a call and I will process it.

Mr. Dickinson: What we are going to try to do is have the city speak to the engineer, certify the official city map that is basic for all this work and put the same topo lines on the final plans and have them sign that. Will that be an acceptable approach?

Bob: Yes

Denise Gaffey: What will happen on the 21st?

Bob: On the 21st you will have a formal hearing with a presentation by you or someone describing the project and there will be questions asked of the individual who is submitting the plans.

Denise Gaffey: Would you determine then if there were any permits needed?

Bob: At that point we will probably make a decision for an approval since it is an abbreviated Notice of Intent and a vote will be taken. If you have an approval you are on your way and if there is a denial you can appeal the case to DEP and you have twenty-five days to send an appeal. There is a third option, if you are missing information we can request with your agreement to extend the hearing and come back two weeks later. In that case we don't approve or deny it, but just extend it.

Soccer Fields/Fertilizing

Mr. Dickinson: At some point I think we should get together and have a conversation about phosphorous loading to the pond. I don't know if there are any restrictions from your committee on fertilizing the soccer fields in the area.

Bob: Technically they should be using a low organic regarding a lot of soccer requests that have come in. I can look that up. In all the repairs of soccer fields in the past four to five years part of the Order of Conditions was to use the low phosphorous. I can request from the Rick Amirault of the Park Department what they are using, and if not, we can go back and request them to fertilize according to the Order of Conditions.

1 Maple Terrace

Update on 1 Maple Terrace - DEP#217110, the Superceding Order of Conditions Affirmation. This is the appeal done by Frederick & Julia Cefalo. The Metropolitan Boston Northeast Office of DEP completed its review of this file in preparation to issuing a superceding OOC. The Department is issuing the OOC by allowing the project by affirming the Melrose Conservation Commission's Order of Conditions based upon information and plans submitted, information gathered during the on site inspection of 8/5/99, and the reason the department has deemed necessary to project an interest identified in the Wetlands Protection Act. The local OOC was appealed by the Cefalos because they believed the commission did not address the work associated with the reconstruction of Maple Terrace in the riverfront area properly and because of their concern about the unauthorized use of their property for certain portions of the proposed project. After careful consideration of both of these issues the Department finds the repair of the roadway Maple Terrace is an allowed activity in the riverfront area under 310CMR 10586A and that the Cefalo's concern about their personal property rights cannot be addressed through the appeal pursuant to the Wetlands Protection Act. The Department is of the opinion that the Order of Conditions issued by the Melrose Conservation Commission allowing the project served to protect the interest of the Wetlands Protection Act, Mass General Law Chapters 131 Section 40, pursuant to 310CMR 10057I. The Department is therefore affirming the local authority by inclusion in the attached superseding OOC. All of the reports water quality sampling and wetland replication should still be sent to Melrose Conservation Commission, with a copy sent to the DEP. It is the Department's responsibility to address only those interests identified in the act.

McLaughlin Insurance/Fellsway

There was a question regarding the McLaughlin project on the Fellsway to take off the roof and build up. It has been observed that the whole building is being demolished. The Melrose Conservation Commission should have been notified and Bob Boisselle will look into this project.

3 Maple Terrace/Anthony & Adele Dantona

It was expected that a public hearing would be held tonight regarding the installation of an in-ground pool and retaining wall at 3 Maple Terrace, Anthony & Adele Dantona. However, the applicant and interested parties did not attend this meeting.

It was voted to adjourn at 8:20 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Nancy Pritchard
Commission Secretary